Title IX Information
Title IX Rights and Responsibilities
Through July 31, 2024
Effective through July 31, 2024
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq., is a Federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities. All public schools, like Milford School District (“the District”), that receive any Federal funds must comply with Title IX.
Under Title IX, schools must operate free from sex discrimination, including sexual harassment.
-
A school employee conferring an educational benefit or service upon a person’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct (often called “quid pro quo” harassment);
-
Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the school’s education program or activity; or
- Sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, or stalking.
The District has a responsibility to respond promptly and equitably. If the District knows or reasonably should know about sex discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual violence within the District’s education program or activity, the District will take immediate action to eliminate the sex discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual violence, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects.
A criminal investigation into allegations of sexual harassment or sexual violence does not relieve the District of its duty under Title IX to resolve complaints promptly and equitably.
The District does not discriminate on the basis of sex, nor does it tolerate discrimination on the basis of sex in its education programs and activities. The District strives to provide an environment free from sex discrimination, including sexual harassment. The District encourages students, parents, and staff to identify barriers to a discrimination-free environment in all schools. Any person (e.g., the alleged victim or any third party) may make a report to the Title IX Coordinator.
Complaints and/or inquiries concerning allegations of sexual harassment, or discrimination on the basis of sex, shall be directed to the District’s Title IX coordinator in person, or by phone, mail, or e-mail, or to the Office of Civil Rights. Any person (e.g., the alleged victim or any third party) may report to the Title IX Coordinator. All complaints will be received and investigated in a prompt and equitable manner.
- The availability of supportive measures to restore access to the school’s education program or activity with or without the filing of a formal complaint;
- The right to file a complaint to initiate an investigation into the sexual harassment allegations; and
- The process for filing a formal complaint.
The Title IX Coordinator will provide the complainant with information concerning the right to supportive measures even if no formal complaint is filed. The District will consider the alleged victim’s wishes with respect to requests for supportive measures. The respondent may also benefit from supportive measures. Supportive measures are free, individualized services designed to restore or preserve equal access to education, protect safety, or deter sexual harassment, not disciplinary or punitive, and without unreasonably burdening any other person. Examples of supportive measures may include:
- Counseling;
- Extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments;
- Modifications of work or class schedules;
- Campus escort services;
- Leave of absence;
- Increased security or monitoring of certain parts of campus; and/or
- Mutual restrictions on contact between individuals.
The District will keep confidential any supportive measures provided to the extent it does not impair the District’s ability to provide the supportive measure. The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the effective supportive measures.
FORMAL COMPLAINT OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT
A formal complaint is an official document alleging sexual harassment. The District will investigate the allegations set forth in a formal complaint.
A formal complaint must be submitted by the student, or the student’s parent or legal guardian (in some cases), or signed by the Title IX Coordinator.
Even if the student opts not to file a formal complaint, the Title IX Coordinator may decide to file a formal complaint on his/her own, which starts an investigation.
Emergency Removal: A respondent may be removed from education programs or activities on an emergency basis if the respondent poses an immediate threat to anyone’s physical health or safety.
GRIEVANCE PROCESS:
The following are procedures for the grievance process for student and employee complaints of sexual harassment:
- The individuals involved in this grievance process are prohibited from discriminating against a complainant or respondent on the basis of sex.
- Prior to the interview of the respondent, both parties (the complainant and respondent) will receive written notice of the grievance process, notice of the allegations, the presumption of innocence of the respondent, an equal opportunity to select an advisor of the party’s choice (who may be, but does not need to be, an attorney), an equal opportunity to submit, inspect, and review evidence throughout the investigation, [Note: Milford School District’s code of conduct includes an infraction for falsification of written documents or verbal accounts. This includes but is not limited to making something false for the purpose of deception of fraud, altering something for the purpose of deception, or using a false name or identification.] and notice of the opportunity to engage in informal resolution.
- The District will provide written notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all hearings, interviews, or other meetings, with sufficient time for the party to prepare.
- The District will provide equal opportunities for the parties and their advisors to inspect and review the evidence obtained by the school as part of its investigation, if the information is directly related to the allegations raised in the formal complaint.
- The District will give the parties a meaningful opportunity to respond to the evidence after the District has provided it.
- After gathering evidence, the District will provide an investigative report on the allegations of the formal complaint. The parties will have 10 calendar days to respond to the report in writing. If responses are submitted, the District will consider the response before finalizing the investigative report.
- The investigative report will then be finalized and provided to the parties. The investigative report will be circulated to the parties at least another 10 calendar days before any determination of responsibility, or 10 calendar days before a hearing, if a hearing occurs.
- Temporary delays are permitted only for good cause. Good cause can include law enforcement activities, the absence of a party or witness, the absence of a party’s advisor of choice, or the need to provide language assistance or accommodations of disabilities.
- The District will protect parties’ privacy by requiring a party’s written consent before using the party’s medical, psychological, or similar treatment records during the grievance process.
- No information protected by a legal privilege, such as the attorney-client privilege or the doctor-patient privilege, can be used during an investigation unless the person holding that privilege has waived it. Neither a party or the school is allowed to seek or permit questions about, or allow the introduction of evidence that is protected by a recognized privilege.
- The relevant evidence, including inculpatory and exculpatory evidence, will be objectively evaluated.
- Credibility determinations will not be made on the basis of a person’s status as a complainant, respondent, or witness.
- The District will apply a presumption that the respondent is not responsible during the grievance process (often called a “presumption of innocence”).
- The District bears the burden of proof and must correctly apply the standard of evidence. Any finding of responsibility comes at the conclusion of the grievance process. The District will use the preponderance of evidence standard (the same standard will be used for formal complaints against students as for formal complaints against employees);
- The District will either hold a live hearing, or allow the parties to submit relevant written questions for the other parties and witnesses to answer prior to making a determination;
- If a live hearing is held, the parties’ advisors are permitted to cross-examine other parties and witnesses. No party is permitted to cross-examine other parties and witnesses. If a party does not have an advisor, the District will provide the party with an advisor of the District’s choosing, free of charge, solely for the purpose of conducting relevant cross-examination on that party’s behalf. The advisor does not need to be a lawyer.
- If a party or witness chooses not to appear at the live hearing, or chooses not to answer cross examination questions, the decision-maker will exclude that party’s or witness’s statements and will evaluate any evidence that does not involve those statements. The decision-maker will not make inferences about the determination regarding responsibility based on the fact that a party or witness did not come to the hearing or submit to cross-examination.
- If either party requests it, the entire hearing will be held with the parties located in separate rooms, with technology enabling everyone to see and hear each other. In order to better coordinate schedules, the District may choose to hold the entire live hearing virtually, or the District may allow some participants to appear virtually, with technology that allows everyone to see and hear each other.
- The District will comply with all disability laws, so that individuals with disabilities who participate in a school’s grievance process are appropriately accommodated.
-
The decision-maker will make a determination as to whether a question asked by a party advisor is relevant BEFORE the party or witness has to answer it.
-
Questions and evidence about a complainant’s prior sexual history are not relevant, with two limited exceptions:
- The District will create an audio or audiovisual recording, or transcript, of any live hearing, and make it available to the parties for inspection and review.
DECISION-MAKER AND DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY:
- The District will ensure the decision-maker is not the same person as the investigator or the Title IX Coordinator and will ensure there are no other conflicts of interest or bias with any of the individuals involved in the grievance process.
- The District will ensure all decision-makers receive training regarding bias and relevancy of evidence.
- Whether or not a hearing was held, the District’s decision-maker will objectively evaluate the relevant evidence and reach conclusions about whether the respondent is responsible for the alleged sexual harassment.
- The decision-maker will weigh the relevant evidence and decide whether it meets the District’s standard of evidence for sexual harassment.
- The District will send the written determination simultaneously to the parties, along with information regarding how to appeal the determination.
- The decision-maker’s written determination will include the following:
- If a respondent is found responsible for sexual harassment, the District will effectively implement remedies for a complainant designed to preserve or restore equal access to the school’s education program or activity.
- A complainant’s remedies can be disciplinary against the respondent and can range from a disciplinary referral to a recommendation for expulsion depending on the circumstances. Supportive measures such as the following may also be implemented:
- Counseling;
- Extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments;
- Modifications or work or class schedules;
- Campus escort services;
- Leave of absence;
- Increased security or monitoring of certain parts of campus; and/or
- Mutual restrictions on contact between individuals (if there is a determination of sexual harassment, a no-contact restriction may be implemented).
DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS:
-
Does not describe conduct that meets the definition of sexual harassment;
-
Alleges sexual harassment that did not occur in the District’s education program or activity; and/or
-
Alleges sexual harassment that did not occur in the United States at all.
-
These complaints may be addressed under the code of conduct depending on the circumstances.
- If the complainant notifies the Title IX coordinator in writing that the complainant wishes to withdraw the formal complaint or some of its allegations;
- If the respondent is not enrolled in, or employed by, the District; or
- If specific circumstances prevent the school from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination about the allegations.
APPEAL OF THE DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY:
- If a party files an appeal, the District will notify the parties in writing, and will implement appeal procedures equally.
- Both parties will have the opportunity to submit a written statement supporting or challenging the outcome.
- After considering the parties’ written statements, the Superintendent (or designee) will issue a written decision no later than 15 calendar days from the parties’ written submission and send it to the parties simultaneously.
- The Superintendent’s (or designee’s) determination regarding whether the respondent is responsible for the sexual harassment allegations becomes final after appeal.
INFORMAL RESOLUTION PROCESS:
- In appropriate cases, the District may explore the facilitation of a voluntary, informal resolution of the formal complaint. This is not an option in any case where the respondent is a District employee.
- The District will only attempt informal resolution if each party enters the process completely voluntarily. No party will ever been forced or coerced into engaging in an informal resolution.
- The District will obtain the parties’ voluntary, written consent before using any type of informal resolution process, such as mediation or restorative justice.
- The District will provide a facilitator who is free from conflicts of interest or bias, and who has received special training.
- Even in situations where the parties engage in voluntary informal resolution, the District will provide the complainant and respondent with notice of the allegations, notice of their rights, information about whether an informal process is confidential, and assurance that any party may withdraw from the informal resolution process at any time before an agreement is reached.
RECORD KEEPING
PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION
Effective August 1, 2024
I. Nondiscrimination Policy & Notice of Nondiscrimination
The Milford School District (the “District”) adheres to all federal, state, and local civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment in employment and education. The District does not discriminate in its admissions practices, employment practices, or educational programs or activities on the basis of sex, except as may be permitted by law. As a recipient of federal financial assistance for education activities, the District is required by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) to ensure that all of its education programs and activities do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Sex includes sex, sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy or related conditions. Sex discrimination is prohibited under Title IX and by District Policy, and it includes sex-based harassment, sexual assault, dating and domestic violence, stalking, quid pro quo harassment, hostile environment harassment, disparate treatment, and disparate impact.
The District also prohibits retaliation against any person opposing discrimination or harassment or participating in any internal or external investigation or complaint process related to allegations of sex discrimination.
Any District employee or student who acts to deny, deprive, or limit the educational, employment, residential, or social access, opportunities, and/or benefits of any member of the District community on the basis of sex is in violation of this Policy.
Any person may report sex discrimination (whether or not the person reporting is alleged to have experienced the conduct) in person, by mail, by telephone, by video, or by email, using the contact information listed for the Title IX Coordinator (below). A report may be made at any time (including during non-business hours) by contacting the Title IX Coordinator.
Questions regarding Title IX, including its application and/or concerns about noncompliance, should be directed to the Title IX Coordinator. For a complete copy of the Policy or more information, please visit milfordhr@msd.k12.de.us or contact the Title IX Coordinator.
Director of Human Resources
Milford School District
906 Lakeview Avenue
Milford, DE 19963
Tel: 302-422-1600
Email: milfordhr@msd.k12.de.us
1 Certain portions of this policy are based on ATIXA’s model policies.
A person may also file a complaint with the appropriate federal, state, or local agency within the time frame required by law. Depending upon the nature of the complaint, the appropriate agency may be the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the Department of Justice, and/or another appropriate federal or state agency.
Philadelphia Office
Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Education
The Wanamaker Building
100 Penn Square East, Suite 515
Philadelphia, PA 19107-3323
Telephone: 215-656-8541
FAX: 215-656-8605; TDD: 800-877-8339
Email: OCR.Philadelphia@ed.gov
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights
Office for Civil Rights, National Headquarters
U.S. Department of Education
Lyndon Baines Johnson Dept. of Education Building
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202-1100
Telephone: 800-421-3481
Fax: 202-453-6012; TDD: 800-877-8339
Email: OCR@ed.gov
The District provides reasonable accommodations to persons with disabilities and religious accommodations when that accommodation is consistent with federal and state law.
Mandated Reporting and Confidential Employees
All District employees, other than those deemed Confidential Employees, are Mandated Reporters and are expected to promptly report all known details of actual or suspected sex discrimination (including sex-based harassment), and/or retaliation to the Title IX Coordinator immediately, although there are some limited exceptions. Supportive measures may be offered as the result of such disclosures without formal District action.
Complainants may want to carefully consider whether they share personally identifiable details with Mandated Reporters, as those details must be shared with the Title IX Coordinator.
If a Complainant expects formal action in response to their allegations, reporting to any Mandated Reporter can connect them with resources to report Policy violations, and these employees will immediately make a report to the Title IX Coordinator (and/or police, if desired by the Complainant or required by law), who will act when an incident is reported to them.
The following sections describe the District’s reporting options for a Complainant or third party (including parents/guardians when appropriate):
Confidential Employees
To enable Complainants to access support and resources without filing a Complaint, the District has designated specific employees as Confidential Resources. Those designated by the District as Confidential Resources are not required to report actual or suspected discrimination, harassment, or retaliation in a way that identifies the Parties. They will, however, provide the Complainant with the Title IX Coordinator’s contact information and offer options and resources without any obligation to inform an outside agency or District official unless a Complainant has requested the information be shared.
There are two categories of Confidential Employees:
- Those with confidentiality bestowed by law or professional ethics, such as lawyers, medical professionals, clergy, and counselors; and
- Those whom the District has specifically designated as confidential for purposes of providing support and resources to the Complainant; and
For those in category 1), above, to be able to respect confidentiality, they must be in a confidential relationship with the person reporting, such that they are within the scope of their licensure, professional ethics, or confidential role at the time of receiving the notice. These individuals will maintain confidentiality except in extreme cases of immediacy of threat or danger or abuse of a minor, elder, or individual with a disability, or when required to disclose by law or court order.
If a Complainant would like the details of an incident to be kept confidential, the Complainant may speak with the following Confidential Employees:
Confidential Employees
- School Counselors
- School Psychologists, Social Workers
Mandated Reporters
Failure of a Mandated Reporter, as described above in this section, to report an incident of sex discrimination, sex-based harassment, or retaliation of which they become aware is a violation of this Policy and can be subject to disciplinary action for failure to comply/failure to report. This also includes situations when a harasser is a Mandated Reporter. Such individuals are obligated to report their own misconduct, and failure to do so is a chargeable offense under this Policy.
A Mandated Reporter who is themselves a target of harassment or other misconduct under this Policy is not required to report their own experience, though they are, of course, encouraged to do so.
Scope
This Policy is only applicable to alleged incidents that occur after August 1, 2024. For alleged incidents of sexual harassment occurring prior to August 1, 2024, the policy and procedures in place at the time of the alleged incident apply. Applicable versions of those policies and procedures are available from the Title IX Coordinator and are located on the District’s website.
This Policy applies to all employees, students, and other individuals participating in or attempting to participate in the District’s program or activities, including education and employment.
This Policy prohibits sex discrimination as set forth in the Notice of Nondiscrimination. This Policy may be applied to incidents, to patterns, and/or to the institutional culture/climate, all of which may be addressed in accordance with this Policy.
Jurisdiction
This Policy applies to the District’s education programs and activities (defined as including locations, events, or circumstances in which the District exercises substantial control over both the Respondent and the context in which the conduct occurred), circumstances where the District has disciplinary authority, and to misconduct occurring within any building owned or controlled by a District-recognized student organization.
This Policy may also apply to the effects of out of school/off-campus misconduct that limit or deny a person’s access to the District’s education program or activities.
For disciplinary action to be issued under this Policy, the Respondent must be a District student, or employee at the time of the alleged incident. If the Respondent is unknown or is not a member of the District community, the Title IX Coordinator will offer to assist the Complainant in identifying appropriate District and local resources and support options and will implement appropriate supportive measures and/or remedial actions (e.g., trespassing a person from campus). The District can also assist in contacting local or institutional law enforcement if the individual would like to file a police report about criminal conduct.
All vendors serving the District through third-party contracts are subject to the policies and procedures of their employers and/or to policies and procedures to which their employer has agreed to be bound by their contracts.
When the Respondent is enrolled in or employed by another District or institution, the Title IX Coordinator can assist the Complainant in contacting the appropriate individual at that institution, as it may be possible to pursue action under that District’s or institution’s policies.
II. Key definitions
*Complainant means:
(1) A student or employee who is alleged to have been subjected to conduct that could constitute sex discrimination under Title IX or its regulations; or
(2) A person other than a student or employee who is alleged to have been subjected to conduct that could constitute sex discrimination under Title IX or its regulations and who was participating or attempting to participate in the District’s education program or activity at the time of the alleged sex discrimination.
*Complaint means an oral or written request to the District that objectively can be understood as a request for the District to investigate and make a determination about alleged discrimination under Title IX or its regulations.
*Consent is defined as knowing, voluntary, and clear permission by word or action to engage in sexual activity. For consent to be valid, there must be a clear expression in words or actions that the other individual consented to that specific sexual conduct. Consent is evaluated from the perspective of what a reasonable person would conclude are mutually understandable words or actions. Reasonable reciprocation can establish consent. For example, if someone kisses you, you can kiss them back (if you want to) without the need to explicitly obtain their consent to be kissed back. Consent can also be withdrawn once given, as long as the withdrawal is reasonably and clearly communicated. If consent is withdrawn, sexual activity should cease within a reasonably immediate time. Silence or the absence of resistance alone should not be interpreted as consent. Consent is not demonstrated by the absence of resistance. While resistance is not required or necessary, it is a clear demonstration of non-consent. Consent to some sexual contact (such as kissing or fondling) cannot be assumed to be consent for other sexual activity (such as intercourse). A current or previous intimate relationship is not sufficient to constitute consent. The existence of consent is based on the totality of the circumstances evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable person in the same or similar circumstances, including the context in which the alleged misconduct occurred and any similar and previous patterns that may be evidenced.
*Disciplinary sanctions mean consequences imposed on a respondent following a determination under Title IX that the respondent violated the District’s prohibition on sex discrimination.
*Party means a complainant or respondent.
*Pregnancy or related conditions means:
(1) Pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or lactation;
(2) Medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or lactation; or
(3) Recovery from pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, lactation, or related medical conditions.
*Relevant means related to the allegations of sex discrimination under investigation as part of these grievance procedures. Questions are relevant when they seek evidence that may aid in showing whether the alleged sex discrimination occurred, and evidence is relevant when it may aid a decisionmaker in determining whether the alleged sex discrimination occurred.
*Remedies means measures provided, as appropriate, to a complainant or any other person the District identifies as having had their equal access to the District’s education program or activity limited or denied by sex discrimination. These measures are provided to restore or preserve that person’s access to the District’s education program or activity after a recipient determines that sex discrimination occurred.
*Respondent means a person who is alleged to have violated the District’s prohibition on sex discrimination.
*Retaliation means intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination against any person by the District, a student, or an employee or other person authorized by the District to provide aid, benefit, or service under the District’s education program or activity, for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX or its regulations, or because the person has reported information, made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the Title IX regulations.
*Sex-based harassment is a form of sex discrimination and means sexual harassment and other harassment on the basis of sex, including on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity, that is:
(1) Quid pro quo harassment. An employee, agent, or other person authorized by the District to provide an aid, benefit, or service under the recipient’s education program or activity explicitly or impliedly conditioning the provision of such an aid, benefit, or service on a person’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct;
(2) Hostile environment harassment. Unwelcome sex-based conduct that, based on the totality of the circumstances, is subjectively and objectively offensive and is so severe or pervasive that it limits or denies a person’s ability to participate in or benefit from the recipient’s education program or activity (i.e., creates a hostile environment). Whether a hostile environment has been created is a fact-specific inquiry that includes consideration of the following:
(i) The degree to which the conduct affected the complainant’s ability to access the District’s education program or activity;
(ii) The type, frequency, and duration of the conduct;
(iii) The parties’ ages, roles within the District’s education program or activity, previous interactions, and other factors about each party that may be relevant to evaluating the effects of the conduct;
(iv) The location of the conduct and the context in which the conduct occurred; and
(v) Other sex-based harassment in the District’s education program or activity; or
(3) Specific offenses.
(i) Sexual assault meaning an offense classified as a forcible or nonforcible sex offense under the uniform crime reporting system of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
(ii) Dating violence meaning violence committed by a person: (A) Who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim; and (B) Where the existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on a consideration of the following factors: (1) The length of the relationship; (2) The type of relationship; and (3) The frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship;
(iii) Domestic violence meaning felony or misdemeanor crimes committed by a person who: (A) Is a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim under the family or domestic violence laws of the jurisdiction of the recipient, or a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim; (B) Is cohabitating, or has cohabitated, with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner; (C) Shares a child in common with the victim; or (D) Commits acts against a youth or adult victim who is protected from those acts under the family or domestic violence laws of the jurisdiction; or
(iv) Stalking meaning engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to: (A) Fear for the person’s safety or the safety of others; or (B) Suffer substantial emotional distress.
*Supportive measures means individualized measures offered as appropriate, as reasonably available, without unreasonably burdening a complainant or respondent, not for punitive or disciplinary reasons, and without fee or charge to the complainant or respondent to: (1) Restore or preserve that party’s access to the recipient’s education program or activity, including measures that are designed to protect the safety of the parties or the recipient’s educational environment; or (2) Provide support during the recipient’s grievance procedures or during an informal resolution process.
III. Grievance Procedures for Complaints of Sex Discrimination
The District has adopted grievance procedures that provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints made by students, employees, or other individuals who are participating or attempting to participate in its education program or activity, or by the Title IX Coordinator, alleging any action that would be prohibited by Title IX or the Title IX regulations.
The District will treat complainants and respondents equitably. The District presumes that the respondent is not responsible for the alleged sex discrimination until a determination is made at the conclusion of its grievance procedures. The District will take reasonable steps to protect the privacy of the parties and witnesses during its grievance procedures. These steps will not restrict the ability of the parties to obtain and present evidence, including by speaking to witnesses; consult with their family members, confidential resources, or advisors; or otherwise prepare for or participate in the grievance procedures. Retaliation is prohibited.
Complaints:
The following people have a right to make a complaint of sex discrimination, including complaints of sex-based harassment, requesting that the District investigate and make a determination about alleged discrimination under Title IX:
A “complainant,” which includes:
- a student or employee of the District who is alleged to have been subjected to conduct that could constitute sex discrimination under Title IX; or
- a person other than a student or employee of the District who is alleged to have been subjected to conduct that could constitute sex discrimination under Title IX at a time when that individual was participating or attempting to participate in the District’s education program or activity; or
- A parent, guardian, or other authorized legal representative with the legal right to act on behalf of a complainant; or
- The District’s Title IX Coordinator.
Note that a person is entitled to make a complaint of sex-based harassment only if they themselves are alleged to have been subjected to the sex-based harassment, if they have a legal right to act on behalf of such person, or if the Title IX Coordinator initiates a complaint consistent with the requirements of 34 C.F.R. § 106.44(f)(1)(v).
With respect to complaints of sex discrimination other than sex-based harassment, in addition to the people listed above, the following persons have a right to make a complaint:
- Any student or employee the District; or
- Any person other than a student or employee who was participating or attempting to participate in the District’s education program or activity at the time of the alleged sex discrimination.
- The District may consolidate complaints of sex discrimination against more than one respondent, or by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against another party, when the allegations of sex discrimination arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
- When more than one complainant or more than one respondent is involved, references below to a party, complainant, or respondent include the plural, as applicable.
Reports/Complaints of Sex Discrimination, Sex-Based Harassment, and/or Retaliation
A Report provides notice to the District of an allegation or concern about discrimination, harassment, or retaliation and provides an opportunity for the Title IX Coordinator to provide information, resources, and supportive measures.
A Complaint provides notice to the District that the Complainant would like to initiate an investigation or other appropriate resolution procedures. A Complainant or individual may initially make a report and may decide at a later time to make a Complaint. Reports or Complaints of sex discrimination, sex-based harassment, and/or retaliation may be made by filing a Complaint with, or give verbal notice directly to, the Title IX Coordinator. Such a Complaint may be made at any
time (including during non-business hours) by using the telephone number, email address, or by mail to the office of the Title IX Coordinator listed in this Policy.
Reporting carries no obligation to initiate a Complaint, and in most situations, the District is able to respect a Complainant’s request to not initiate the grievance procedures. However, there may be circumstances, such as pattern behavior, allegations of severe misconduct, or a compelling threat to health and/or safety, where the District may need to initiate the grievance procedures. If a Complainant does not wish to file a Complaint, the District will maintain the privacy of information to the extent possible. The Complainant should not fear a loss of confidentiality by giving notice that allows the District to discuss and/or provide supportive measures, in most circumstances.
False Allegations and Evidence
Deliberately false and/or malicious accusations under this Policy are a serious offense and will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. This does not include allegations that are made in good faith but are ultimately shown to be erroneous or do not result in a determination of a Policy violation.
Additionally, witnesses and Parties who knowingly provide false evidence, tamper with or destroy evidence, or deliberately mislead an official conducting an investigation or resolution process can be subject to discipline under appropriate District policies.
Upon receipt of a Complaint, or knowledge of an alleged Policy violation, the Title IX Coordinator will initiate a prompt initial evaluation to determine the District’s next steps. The Title IX Coordinator will contact the Complainant/source of the notice to offer supportive measures, provide information regarding resolution options, and determine how they wish to proceed.
Initial Evaluation
The Title IX Coordinator will conduct an initial evaluation typically within seven (7) business days of receiving a Complaint of alleged misconduct. The initial evaluation typically includes:
- Assessing whether the reported conduct may reasonably constitute a violation of the Policy.
- If the conduct may not reasonably constitute a violation of the Policy, the matter is typically dismissed from this process, consistent with the dismissal provision in these procedures. It may then be referred to another process, if applicable.
- Determining whether the District has jurisdiction over the reported conduct, as defined in the Policy.
- If the conduct is not within the District’s jurisdiction, the matter is typically dismissed from this process, consistent with the dismissal provision in these procedures. If applicable, the conduct will be referred to the appropriate District department for resolution.
- Offering and coordinating supportive measures for the Complainant.
- Offering and coordinating supportive measures for the Respondent, as applicable.
- Notifying the Complainant, or the person who reported the allegation(s), of the resolution processes, including a supportive and remedial response, an Informal Resolution option, or the grievance procedures described below.
- Determining whether the Complainant wishes to make a Complaint.
- Notifying the Respondent of the grievance procedures, including a supportive and remedial response, or an Informal Resolution option, if a Complaint is made.
Helping a Complainant to Understand Options
If the Complainant indicates they wish to initiate a Complaint (in a manner that can reasonably be construed as reflecting intent to make a Complaint), the Title IX Coordinator will help to facilitate the Complaint, which will include:
- Working with the Complainant to determine whether the Complainant wishes to pursue one of three resolution options:
- a supportive and remedial response, and/or
- Informal Resolution, or
- the grievance procedures described below.
The Title IX Coordinator will seek to abide by the wishes of the Complainant but may have to take an alternative approach depending on their analysis of the situation.
If the Complainant elects to initiate the grievance procedures below, and the Title IX Coordinator has determined the Policy applies and that the District has jurisdiction, they initiate the grievance procedures, will provide the Parties with a notice of Investigation and allegation(s), and will initiate an investigation consistent with these procedures.
If any Party indicates (either verbally or in writing) that they want to pursue an Informal Resolution option, the Title IX Coordinator will assess whether the matter is suitable for Informal Resolution and refer the matter, accordingly.
If the Complainant indicates (either verbally or in writing) that they do not want any action taken, no Resolution Process will be initiated (unless deemed necessary by the Title IX Coordinator), though the Complainant can elect to initiate one later, if desired.
Title IX Coordinator Authority to Initiate a Complaint
If the Complainant does not wish to file a Complaint, the Title IX Coordinator, who has ultimate discretion as to whether a Complaint is initiated, will offer supportive measures and determine whether to initiate a Complaint themselves. To make this determination, the Title IX Coordinator will evaluate that request to determine if there is a serious and imminent threat to someone's safety or if the District cannot ensure equal access without initiating a Complaint. The Title IX Coordinator will consider the following non-exhaustive factors to determine whether to file a Complaint:
- The Complainant’s request not to proceed with initiation of a Complaint;
- The Complainant’s reasonable safety concerns regarding initiation of a Complaint;
- The risk that additional acts of discrimination would occur if a Complaint is not initiated;
- The severity of the alleged discrimination, including whether the discrimination, if established, would require the removal of a Respondent from campus or imposition of another disciplinary sanction to end the discrimination and prevent its recurrence;
- The age and relationship of the Parties, including whether the Respondent is a District employee;
- The scope of the alleged discrimination, including information suggesting a pattern, ongoing discrimination, or discrimination alleged to have impacted multiple individuals;
- The availability of evidence to assist a Decision-maker in determining whether discrimination occurred;
- Whether the District could end the alleged discrimination and prevent its recurrence without initiating its resolution process.
If deemed necessary, the Title IX Coordinator may consult with appropriate District employees, and/or conduct a violence risk assessment to aid their determination whether to initiate a Complaint.
When the Title IX Coordinator initiates a Complaint, they do not become the Complainant. The Complainant is the person who experienced the alleged conduct that could constitute a violation of this Policy.
Notice of Allegations:
Upon initiation of the District’s Title IX grievance procedures, the District will notify the parties of the following:
- A meaningful summary of all allegations
- The identity of the involved Parties (if known)
- The precise misconduct being alleged
- The date and location of the alleged incident(s) (if known)
- The specific policies/offenses implicated
- A description of, link to, or copy of the applicable procedures and informal resolution procedures
- A statement that the Parties are entitled to an equal opportunity to access the relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence
- The name(s) of the Investigator(s), along with a process to identify to the Title IX Coordinator in advance of the interview process, any conflict of interest that the Investigator(s) may have
- A statement that the District presumes the Respondent is not responsible for the reported misconduct unless and until the evidence supports a different determination
- A statement that determinations of responsibility are made at the conclusion of the grievance procedures, and that the Parties will be given an opportunity during the review and comment period to inspect and review all relevant evidence
- A statement that retaliation is prohibited
- Information about the confidentiality of the process, including that the Parties and their Advisors (if applicable) may not share District work product obtained through the Resolution Process
- A statement that the Parties may have an Advisor of their choice who may accompany them through all steps of the Resolution Process
- A statement informing the Parties that the District’s Policy prohibits knowingly making false statements, including knowingly submitting false information during the grievance procedures
- Detail on how a party may request disability accommodations during the grievance procedures
- An instruction to preserve any evidence that is directly related to the allegations
- A statement that Parties who are members of a union are entitled to union representation throughout the process
Notification will be made in writing and may be delivered by one or more of the following methods: in person, mailed to the local or permanent address(es) of the Parties as indicated in official District records, or emailed to the Parties’ District-issued email or designated accounts. Once mailed, emailed, and/or received in person, the notification will be presumptively delivered.
If, in the course of an investigation, the District decides to investigate additional allegations of sex discrimination by the respondent toward the complainant that are not included in the notice provided or that are included in a complaint that is consolidated, the District will notify the parties of the additional allegations.
Timelines
The District will make a good faith effort to complete the grievance procedures within sixty to ninety (60-90) business days, including any appeals, which can be extended as necessary for appropriate cause by the Title IX Coordinator. The Parties will receive regular updates on the progress of the grievance procedures as well as notification and a rationale for any extensions or delays, and an estimate of how much additional time will be needed to complete the process.
Investigations are completed expeditiously, normally within sixty (60) business days, though some investigations may take longer, depending on issues such as the nature, extent, and complexity of the allegations, witness availability, law enforcement involvement, and other factors.
If a party or witness chooses not to participate in the grievance procedures or becomes unresponsive, the District reserves the right to continue it without their participation to ensure a prompt resolution. Non-participatory or unresponsive Parties retain the rights outlined in this Policy and the opportunity to participate in the grievance procedures.
The District may undertake a brief delay in its investigation (several days to a few weeks) if circumstances require. Such circumstances include but are not limited to a request from law enforcement to delay the investigation temporarily, the need for language assistance, the absence of Parties and/or witnesses, and/or health conditions. The District will promptly resume its grievance procedures as soon as feasible. During such a delay, the District will implement and maintain supportive measures for the Parties as deemed appropriate.
District action(s) or processes are not typically altered or precluded on the grounds that civil or criminal charges involving the underlying incident(s) have been filed or that criminal charges have been dismissed or reduced.
The District will make a good faith effort to complete the grievance procedures as promptly as circumstances permit and will communicate regularly with the Parties to update them on the progress and timing of the process.
Ensuring Impartiality
Any individual materially involved in the administration of the Resolution Process, including the Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), and Decision-maker(s), may neither have nor demonstrate a conflict of interest or bias for a party generally, or for a specific Complainant or Respondent.
The Title IX Coordinator will vet the assigned Investigator(s), Decision-maker(s), and Appeal Decision-Maker(s) for impartiality by ensuring there are no actual or apparent conflicts of interest or disqualifying biases. At any time during the grievance procedures, the Parties may raise a concern regarding bias or conflict of interest, and the Title IX Coordinator will determine whether the concern is reasonable and supportable. If so, another individual will be assigned, and the impact of the bias or conflict, if any, will be remedied. If the source of the conflict of interest or bias is the Title IX Coordinator, concerns should be raised with the Superintendent.
The grievance procedures involve an objective evaluation of all available relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence, including evidence that supports that the Respondent engaged in a Policy violation and evidence that supports that the Respondent did not engage in a Policy violation. Credibility determinations may not be based solely on an individual’s status or participation as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness. All Parties have a full and fair opportunity, through the investigation process, to suggest witnesses and questions, to provide evidence, and to receive a written investigation report that accurately summarizes this evidence.
Dismissal of a Complaint:
The District may dismiss a complaint of sex discrimination if:
- The District is unable to identify the respondent after taking reasonable steps to do so;
- The respondent is not participating in the District’s education program or activity and is not employed by District;
- The complainant voluntarily withdraws any or all of the allegations in the complaint, the Title IX Coordinator declines to initiate a complaint, and the District determines that, without the complainant’s withdrawn allegations, the conduct that remains alleged in the complaint, if any, would not constitute sex discrimination under Title IX even if proven; or
- The District determines the conduct alleged in the complaint, even if proven, would not constitute sex discrimination under Title IX. Before dismissing the complaint, the District will make reasonable efforts to clarify the allegations with the complainant.
Upon dismissal, the District will promptly notify the complainant of the basis for the dismissal. If the dismissal occurs after the respondent has been notified of the allegations, then the District will also notify the respondent of the dismissal and the basis for the dismissal promptly following notification to the complainant, or simultaneously if notification is in writing. The District will notify the complainant that a dismissal may be appealed and will provide the complainant with an opportunity to appeal the dismissal of a complaint. If the dismissal occurs after the respondent has been notified of the allegations, then the District will also notify the respondent that the dismissal may be appealed.
-
Procedural irregularity that would change the outcome;
- New evidence that would change the outcome and that was not reasonably available when the dismissal was made; and
- The Title IX Coordinator, investigator, or decisionmaker had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual complainant or respondent that would change the outcome.
-
Notify the parties of any appeal, including notice of the allegations, if notice was not previously provided to the respondent;
- Implement appeal procedures equally for the parties;
- Ensure that the decisionmaker for the appeal did not take part in an investigation of the allegations or dismissal of the complaint;
- Ensure that the decisionmaker for the appeal has been trained consistent with the Title IX regulations;
- Provide the parties a reasonable and equal opportunity to make a statement in support of, or challenging, the outcome; and
- Notify the parties of the result of the appeal and the rationale for the result.
-
Offer supportive measures to the complainant as appropriate;
- If the respondent has been notified of the allegations, offer supportive measures to the respondent as appropriate; and
- Take other prompt and effective steps, as appropriate, through the Title IX Coordinator to ensure that sex discrimination does not continue or recur within the District’s education program or activity.
The District may emergency remove a student accused of Sex Discrimination or Sex-based Harassment upon receipt of a complaint or notice of any allegations of Sex Discrimination or Sex-based Harassment, or at any time during the resolution process. Prior to an emergency removal, the District will conduct an individualized risk assessment and may remove the student if that assessment determines that an imminent and serious threat to the health or safety of a Complainant or any students, employees, or other persons arising from the allegations of sex discrimination justifies such action. Students accused of other forms of discrimination (not sex) are subject to interim suspension, which can be imposed for safety reasons.
When an emergency removal is imposed, wholly or partially, the affected student will be notified of the action, which will include a written rationale, and the option to challenge the emergency removal within three (3) business days of the notification. Upon receipt of a challenge, the Title IX Coordinator will meet with the student (and their Advisor, if desired) as soon as reasonably possible thereafter to allow them to show cause why the removal/action should not be implemented or should be modified.
This meeting is not a hearing on the merits of the allegation(s), but rather is an administrative process intended to determine solely whether the emergency removal or interim suspension is appropriate, should be modified, or lifted. When this meeting is not requested within three (3) business days, objections to the emergency removal or interim suspension will be deemed waived. A student can later request a meeting to show why they are no longer an imminent and serious threat because conditions related to imminence or seriousness have changed. A Complainant and their Advisor may be permitted to participate in this meeting if the Title IX Coordinator determines it is equitable to do so.
The Respondent may provide information, including expert reports, witness statements, communications, or other documentation for consideration prior to or during the meeting. When applicable, a Complainant may provide information to the Title IX Coordinator for review.
An emergency removal may be affirmed, modified, or lifted as a result of a requested review or as new information becomes available. The Title IX Coordinator will communicate the final decision in writing, typically within three (3) business days of the review meeting.
Placing an Employee on Leave
When the Respondent is an employee accused of misconduct in the course of their employment, the employee may be placed on leave pending the completion of the grievance procedures.
The District will offer and coordinate supportive measures as appropriate for the complainant and/or respondent to restore or preserve that person’s access to the District’s education program or activity or provide support during the District’s Title IX grievance procedures or during the informal resolution process. For complaints of sex-based harassment, these supportive measures may include:
-
Referral to counseling, medical, and/or other healthcare services
-
Referral to community-based service providers
-
Education to the institutional community or community subgroup(s)
-
Altering work arrangements for employees
-
Safety planning
-
Providing campus safety escorts
-
Implementing contact limitations (no contact orders) between the Parties
-
Academic support, extensions of deadlines, or other course/program-related adjustments
-
Timely warnings
-
Class schedule modifications, withdrawals, or leaves of absence
-
Increased security and monitoring of certain areas of the campus
-
Any other actions deemed appropriate by the Title IX Coordinator
The Parties are provided with a timely opportunity to seek modification or reversal of the District’s decision to provide, deny, modify, or terminate supportive measures applicable to them. A request to do so should be made in writing to the Title IX Coordinator. An impartial employee other than the employee who implemented the supportive measures, who has authority to modify or reverse the decision, will determine whether to provide, deny, modify, or terminate the supportive measures if they are inconsistent with the definition of supportive measures in § 106.2 of the federal Title IX Regulations. The District will also provide the Parties with the opportunity to seek additional modification or termination of supportive measures applicable to them if circumstances change materially. The District typically renders decisions on supportive measures within seven (7) business days of receiving a request and provides a written determination to the impacted party(ies) and the Title IX Coordinator.
*Students with Disabilities: If the Complainant or Respondent is a student with a disability, the Title IX Coordinator shall consult with one or more members of the student’s IEP team, or one or more members of the student’s 504 team responsible for the student’s placement decision to determine how to comply with requirements of IDEA and Section 504 in the implementation of supportive measures.
Advisors
The Parties may each have an Advisor (friend, mentor, family member, attorney, or any other individual a party chooses) present with them for all meetings, interviews, and hearings during the grievance procedures, including intake. The Parties may select whomever they wish to serve as their Advisor as long as the Advisor is eligible and available.
The District fully respects the Weingarten rights of employees, meaning that for Parties who are entitled to union representation, the Recipient will provide notice and allow the unionized employee to have their union representative (if requested by the party) as well as an Advisor of their choice present for all resolution-related meetings and interviews. To uphold the principles of equity, the other party (regardless of union membership) will also be permitted to have two Advisors.
Advisors should help the Parties to prepare for each meeting and are expected to advise ethically, with integrity, and in good faith. Advisors may not provide testimony or speak on behalf of their advisee unless given specific permission to do so.
Any Advisor who oversteps their role as defined by the Policy, who shares information or evidence in a manner inconsistent with the Policy, or who refuses to comply with the Recipient’s established rules of decorum, will be warned. If the Advisor continues to disrupt or otherwise fails to respect the limits of the Advisor role, the meeting/interview may be ended, or other appropriate measures implemented, including the District requiring the party to use a different Advisor or providing a different District-appointed Advisor. Subsequently, the Title IX Coordinator will determine how to address the Advisor’s non-compliance and future role.
Investigation Procedures
The District will provide for adequate, reliable, and impartial investigation of complaints. The burden is on the District—not on the parties—to conduct an investigation that gathers sufficient evidence to determine whether sex discrimination occurred. The District will provide an equal opportunity for the parties to present fact witnesses and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence that are relevant and not otherwise impermissible.
Once an investigation is initiated, the Title IX Coordinator appoints an Investigator(s) to conduct it. The Investigator will review all evidence gathered through the investigation and determine what evidence is relevant and what evidence is impermissible regardless of relevance.
The Investigator(s) will only consider evidence that is deemed relevant and not otherwise impermissible.
Relevant evidence is that which may aid in determining whether the allegation occurred, or whether the behavior constitutes a violation of Policy.
The following types of evidence, and questions seeking that evidence, are impermissible (i.e., will not be accessed or considered, except by the District to determine whether one of the exceptions listed below applies; will not be disclosed; and will not otherwise be used), regardless of whether they are relevant:
-
Evidence that is protected under a privilege recognized by Federal or State law or evidence provided to a confidential employee, unless the person to whom the privilege or confidentiality is owed has voluntarily waived the privilege or confidentiality;
-
A party’s or witness’s records that are made or maintained by a physician, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional in connection with the provision of treatment to the party or witness, unless the District obtains that party’s or witness’s voluntary, written consent for use in its grievance procedures; and
-
Evidence that relates to the complainant’s sexual interests or prior sexual conduct, unless evidence about the complainant’s prior sexual conduct is offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the alleged conduct or is evidence about specific incidents of the complainant’s prior sexual conduct with the respondent that is offered to prove consent to the alleged sex-based harassment. The fact of prior consensual sexual conduct between the complainant and respondent does not by itself demonstrate or imply the complainant’s consent to the alleged sex-based harassment or preclude determination that sex-based harassment occurred.
Within the limitations stated above, the investigation and determination can consider character evidence, if offered, but that evidence is unlikely to be relevant unless it is fact evidence or relates to a pattern of conduct.
Employees (not including Complainant and Respondent) are required to cooperate with and participate in the District’s investigation and Resolution Process. Student witnesses and witnesses from outside the District community cannot be required to participate but are encouraged to cooperate with District investigations and to share what they know about a Complaint.
Interviews may be conducted in person, via online video platforms (e.g., Zoom, Microsoft Teams, FaceTime, WebEx, etc.), or, in limited circumstances, by telephone. The District will take appropriate steps to ensure the security/privacy of remote interviews.
Parties and witnesses may also provide written statements in lieu of interviews or choose to respond to written questions, if deemed appropriate by the Investigator(s), though not preferred.
The District will provide each party with an equal opportunity to access the evidence that is relevant to the allegations of sex discrimination and not otherwise impermissible, in the following manner:
The District will provide each party with an equal opportunity to access the evidence that is relevant to the allegations of sex discrimination and not otherwise impermissible, in the following manner:
-
The District will provide the parties with an equal opportunity to access the relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence upon the request of any party
-
The District will provide a reasonable opportunity to respond to the evidence or the accurate description of the evidence; and
-
The District will take reasonable steps to prevent and address the parties’ unauthorized disclosure of information and evidence obtained solely through the grievance procedures. Disclosures of such information and evidence for purposes of administrative proceedings or litigation related to the complaint of sex discrimination are authorized.
The Investigator(s) typically take(s) the following steps, if not already completed and not necessarily in this order:
-
Determine the identity and contact information of the Complainant.
-
Identify all policies implicated by the alleged misconduct and notify the Complainant and Respondent of all specific policies implicated.
-
Assist the Title IX Coordinator, if needed, with conducting a prompt initial evaluation to determine if the allegations indicate a potential Policy violation.
-
Work with the Title IX Coordinator, as necessary, to prepare the initial notice of investigation and allegations. The initial notice of investigation and allegations may be amended with any additional or dismissed allegations.
-
Commence a thorough, reliable, and impartial investigation by identifying issues and developing a strategic investigation plan, including a witness list, evidence list, intended investigation timeframe, and order of interviews for the Parties and witnesses.
-
When participation of a party is expected, provide that party with written notification of the date, time, and location of the meeting, as well as the expected participants and purpose.
-
Make good faith efforts to notify each party of any meeting or interview involving another party, in advance when possible.
-
Interview the Complainant and the Respondent and conduct follow-up interviews with each, as necessary.
-
Interview all available, relevant witnesses and conduct follow-up interviews as necessary.
-
Allow each party the opportunity to suggest witnesses and provide relevant evidence.
-
Where possible, complete the investigation promptly and without unreasonable deviation from the intended timeline.
-
Write a draft investigation report that gathers, assesses, and synthesizes the evidence, accurately summarizes the investigation, and party and witness interviews, and provides all relevant evidence.
-
Provide the Parties and their respective Advisors an electronic copy of the draft investigation report as well as an opportunity to inspect and review all relevant evidence obtained as part of the investigation for a review and comment period of ten (10) business days so that each party may meaningfully respond to the evidence. The Parties may elect to waive all or part of the review period.
Decision-Making Procedures
Decision-maker’s Evaluation of the Evidence
-
The Decision-maker will review the Final Investigative Report, all appendices, and the investigation file.
-
If the record is incomplete, the Decision-maker may direct a re-opening of the investigation, or may direct or conduct any additional inquiry necessary, including informally meeting with the Parties or any witnesses, if needed.
-
Upon reviewing the relevant evidence, the Decision-maker may also choose to pose additional questions:
-
To the extent credibility is in dispute and relevant to one or more of the allegations, the Decision-maker may meet individually with the Parties and witnesses to question them in order to assess their credibility. These meetings will be recorded and shared with the Parties.
-
At the Decision-maker’s discretion, the Decision-maker may also meet with any party or witness to ask additional relevant questions that will aid the Decision-maker in making their findings. These meetings will be recorded and shared with the Parties.
-
-
If it is later determined that a party or witness intentionally provided false or misleading information, that action could be grounds for re-opening the grievance procedures at any time, and/or referring that information to another process for resolution.
Following an investigation and evaluation of all relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence:
-
The Decision-maker will apply the preponderance of the evidence standard to make a determination on each of the allegations and, if applicable, a recommendation for sanctions and/or remedies.
-
The Decision-maker’s determination process typically takes approximately ten (10) business days, but this timeframe can vary based on a number of factors and variables, The Parties will be notified of any delays.
-
The standard of proof requires the decisionmaker to evaluate relevant and not otherwise impermissible evidence for its persuasiveness.
-
If the Decision-maker is not persuaded under the applicable standard by the evidence that sex discrimination occurred, whatever the quantity of the evidence is, the decisionmaker will not determine that sex discrimination occurred.
-
The Decision-maker will notify the Parties in writing of the determination whether sex discrimination occurred under Title IX including the rationale for such determination, and the procedures and permissible bases for the complainant and respondent to appeal, if applicable;
-
The Decision-maker will not impose discipline on a respondent for sex discrimination prohibited by Title IX unless there is a determination at the conclusion of the grievance procedures that the respondent engaged in prohibited sex discrimination.
-
If there is a determination that sex discrimination occurred, the Title IX Coordinator will, as appropriate:
-
Coordinate the provision and implementation of remedies to a complainant and other people the District identifies as having had equal access to the District’s education program or activity limited or denied by sex discrimination;
-
Coordinate the imposition of any disciplinary sanctions on a respondent, including notification to the complainant of any such disciplinary sanctions; and
-
Take other appropriate prompt and effective steps to ensure that sex discrimination does not continue or recur within the District’s education program or activity.
-
Comply with the grievance procedures before the imposition of any disciplinary sanctions against a respondent; and
-
Not discipline a party, witness, or others participating in the grievance procedures for making a false statement or for engaging in consensual sexual conduct based solely on the determination whether sex discrimination occurred.
-
Students
Should a student respondent decide not to participate in the grievance procedures, the process proceeds absent their participation to a reasonable resolution. If a student respondent withdraws from the District, the grievance procedures may continue, or the Title IX Coordinator may exercise their discretion to dismiss the Complaint. If the Complaint is dismissed, the District will still provide reasonable supportive or remedial measures as deemed necessary to address safety and/or remedy any ongoing effects of the alleged harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation.
Regardless of whether the Complaint is dismissed or pursued to completion of the Resolution Process, the District will continue to address and remedy any systemic issues or concerns that may have contributed to the alleged violation(s), and any ongoing effects of the alleged discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation.
When a student respondent withdraws or leaves while the process is pending, the student may not return to the District in any capacity until the Complaint is resolved and any sanctions imposed are satisfied. If the student indicates they will not return, the District has discretion to dismiss the Complaint.
Should an employee respondent decide not to participate in the grievance procedures, the process proceeds absent their participation to a reasonable resolution. If an employee Respondent withdraws from the District with unresolved allegations pending, the Resolution Process may continue, or the Title IX Coordinator may exercise their discretion to dismiss the Complaint. If the Complaint is dismissed, the District may still provide reasonable supportive or remedial measures as deemed necessary to address safety and/or remedy any ongoing effects of the alleged discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation.
When an employee resigns and the Complaint is dismissed, the employee may not return to the District in any capacity. Human resources will be notified, accordingly, and a note will be placed in the employee’s file that they resigned with allegations pending and are not eligible for rehire with the District. The records retained by the Title IX Coordinator will reflect that status.
Disciplinary Sanctions and Remedies
Following a determination that sex-based harassment or sex discrimination has occurred, the District may impose disciplinary sanctions. The factors considered by the Decision-maker when determining sanctions and responsive actions may include, but are not limited to:
-
The nature, severity of, and circumstances surrounding the violation(s)
-
The Respondent’s disciplinary history
-
The need for sanctions/responsive actions to bring an end to the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation
-
The need for sanctions/responsive actions to prevent the future recurrence of discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation
-
The need to remedy the effects of the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation on the Complainant and the community
-
The impact on the Parties
-
Any other information deemed relevant by the Decision-maker(s)
Sanctions will be implemented as soon as it is feasible once a determination is final. Sanctions described in this Policy are not exclusive of, and may be in addition to, other actions taken, or sanctions imposed, by external authorities.
The following are the common sanctions that may be imposed upon students singly or in combination:
-
Reprimand: A formal statement that the conduct was unacceptable and a warning that further violation of any District Policy, procedure, or directive will result in more severe sanctions/responsive actions.
-
Required Counseling: A mandate to meet with and engage in either District-sponsored or external counseling to better comprehend the misconduct and its effects.
-
Restrictions: A student may be restricted in their activities, including, but not limited to, being restricted from locations, programs, participation in certain activities or extracurriculars, study abroad, or from holding leadership in student organizations.
-
Probation: An official sanction for violation of institutional Policy, providing for more severe disciplinary sanctions in the event that the student is found in violation of any institutional Policy, procedure, or directive within a specified period of time. Terms of the probation will be articulated and may include denial of specified social privileges, exclusion from co-curricular activities, exclusion from designated areas of campus, no-contact orders, and/or other measures deemed appropriate.
-
Suspension: Separation from the institution, or one or more of its facilities, for a definite period of time after which the student is eligible to return. Eligibility may be contingent upon satisfaction of specific conditions noted at the time of suspension, on successfully applying for readmission, or upon a general condition that the student is eligible to return if the institution determines it is appropriate to re-enroll/readmit the student. The student is typically required to vacate institutional property within 24 hours of notification of the action, though this deadline may be extended at the discretion of the Title IX Coordinator or other appropriate official. During an institution-wide suspension, the student is banned from institutional property, functions, events, and activities unless they receive prior written approval from an appropriate institutional official. This sanction may be enforced with a trespass action, as necessary. This sanction may be noted as a Disciplinary Suspension on the student’s official academic transcript.
-
Expulsion: Permanent separation from the institution. The student is banned from institutional property, and the student’s presence at any institution-sponsored activity or event is prohibited. This action may be enforced with a trespass action, as necessary. This sanction may be noted as Disciplinary Expulsion on the student’s official academic transcript.
-
Other Actions: In addition to, or in place of, the above sanctions, the District may assign any other sanctions as deemed appropriate.
Responsive actions for an employee who has engaged in harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation in violation of this Policy may include:
-
Verbal or Written Warning
-
Performance Improvement Plan/Management Process
-
Enhanced Supervision, Observation, or Review
-
Required Counseling
-
Required Training or Education
-
Probation
-
Denial of Pay Increase/Pay Grade
-
Loss of Oversight or Supervisory Responsibility
-
Demotion
-
Transfer
-
Shift or schedule adjustments
-
Reassignment
-
Assignment to New Supervisor
-
Suspension/Administrative Leave with Pay
-
Suspension/Administrative Leave without Pay
-
Termination
-
Other Actions: In addition to or in place of the above sanctions/responsive actions, the District may assign any other responsive actions as deemed appropriate.
-
Referral to counseling and health services
-
Education to the individual and/or the community
-
Permanent alteration of work arrangements for employees
-
Climate surveys
-
Policy modification and/or training
-
Implementation of long-term contact limitations between the Parties
-
Implementation of adjustments to academic deadlines, class schedules, etc.
-
A procedural irregularity that would change the outcome
-
New evidence that would change the outcome and that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made; and/or
-
The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally or the specific Complainant or Respondent that would change the outcome.
-
The allegations;
-
The requirements of the Informal Resolution process;
-
That, prior to agreeing to a resolution, any party has the right to withdraw from the Informal Resolution process and to initiate or resume the District’s grievance procedures;
-
That the Parties’ agreement to a resolution at the conclusion of the Informal Resolution process will preclude the Parties from initiating or resuming the resolution process arising from the same allegations;
-
The potential terms that may be requested or offered in an Informal Resolution agreement, including notification that an Informal Resolution agreement is binding only on the Parties; and
-
What information the District will maintain, and whether and how it could disclose such information for use in its Resolution Process.
-
Supportive Resolution. When the Title IX Coordinator can resolve the matter informally by providing supportive measures (only) designed to remedy the situation.
-
Educational Conversation. When the Title IX Coordinator can resolve the matter informally by having a conversation with the Respondent to discuss the Complainant’s concerns and District expectations or can accompany the Complainant in their desire to confront the conduct.
-
Accepted Responsibility. When the Respondent is willing to accept responsibility for violating Policy and is willing to agree to actions that will be enforced similarly to sanctions, and the Complainant(s) and the District are agreeable to the resolution terms.
-
Alternative Resolution. When the Parties agree to resolve the matter through an alternative resolution mechanism (which could include, but is not limited to, mediation, shuttle negotiation, restorative practices, facilitated dialogue, etc.), as described below.
-
Each discrimination, harassment, and retaliation resolution process, including any Final Determination regarding responsibility or appeal, and any audio or audiovisual recording or transcript required under federal regulation;
-
Any disciplinary sanctions imposed on the Respondent;
-
Any supportive measures provided to the Parties and any remedies provided to the Complainant or the community designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity;
-
Any appeal and the result therefrom;
-
Any Informal Resolution and the result therefrom;
-
All materials used to provide training to Title IX Coordinator and designees, Investigators, Decision-makers, Appeal Decision-makers, Informal Resolution Facilitator, and any person who is responsible for implementing the District’s grievance procedures, or who has the authority to modify or terminate supportive measures. The District will make these training materials available for review upon request.
-
All materials used to train all employees consistent with the requirements in the Title IX Regulations.
-
Language services/Interpreters
-
Access and training regarding use of technology throughout the grievance procedures
-
Other support as deemed reasonable and necessary to facilitate participation in the grievance procedures